Last
Next

fyumé muiq
vocabulary-generated chart of arkons (conjunctions, amounts)

id	all of (and)	tid	none of (nor)	hid	at least none of	xid	at most all of
ið	any of, one of (either/or)	gið	just/exactly one of (or)	hið	at least one of	xið	at most one of
im	four of	gim	just/exactly four of	him	at least four of	xim	at most four of

varkuzan arkon semantic rules
mu'iq varku'zan vlu't
varkuzan preposition vocabulary chart
mu'ej muhe' varku'zan fyu'
varkuzan preposition semantic rules
mu'ej varku'zan vlu't
vyutmu muej
vocabulary-generating list of one-to-one correlatives for prepositions
ðwuð prep-dim type
ðwul prep marker, a priori always "e"
ðwux prep-dim dialectical phase
ðwuel prep-dim overlap phase

1. a varkuzan preposition relates at least one word before itself to at least one word after itself
muc ad tïps mu ahið er ló wid mu ahið ez ló éð
2. a varkuzan preposition only relates more than one word before itself to more than one word after itself if a varkuzan preposition prefix is used
3. all words is varkuzan have an adva value
4. the adva value of a varkuzan word is determined by its part of speech and any adva prefix that could be attached
5. if a varkuzan preposition has no adva prefix, then it relates the nearest noun before itself and the nearest noun after itself
6. if a varkuzan preposition has an adva prefix, then it relates the first component to that adva prefix's definition components and the second component to that adva prefix's definition components relative to itself
varkuzan verb semantic rules
mu'i'z varku'zan vlu't
notes

VARKUZAN CONJOINERS AND SEMANTICS
(abbreviated rendering)

I decided to pair Varkuzan conjoiners with Varkuzan semantics because variations in the semantic function of Varkuzan are realized through variations in Varkuzan conjoiners the exception being punctuation which is already dealt with separately. Moreover, it is easy to treat the whole topic at once.
There are two general types of words in Varkuzan: words that relate (conjoiners) and words that are related (nouns). Varkuzan conjoiners consist of three types: verbs, prepositions, and quanjoiners. (conjuntions as well as quantifers)

á
Naked: Prefix (value is 3)
Adva (Determines Which Words A Preposition Relates)

(blank) last noun to next noun (gram 6.0)
l(ð)-previous conjoiner to next noun
r(j)-previous noun to next conjoiner
w(z)-preceding conjoiner to next conjoiner
gá-first noun to next conjoiner
y(m)-first conjoiner to next noun
xá-previous noun to next prefixed conjoiner
ɽ(s)-previous prefixed conjoiner to next noun
ná- first conjoiner to next conjoiner
cá- previous prefixed conjoiner to next conjoiner
bá-preceding noun to last conjoiner
cpá-preceding conjoiner to last conjoiner
há-last prefixed conjoiner to next prefixed conjoiner
fá-first prefixed conjoiner to next (prefixed) conjoiner
ɣá-first conjoiner to last conjoiner
qá-last prefixed conjoiner to last conjoiner
-lá- prefixed conjoiner to lwy-prefixed conjoiner
-wá- lwy-conjoiner to prefixed conjoiner
-yá- lwy-prefixed conjoiner to lwy-prefixed conjoiner
-rá- lwy-prefixed/prefixed conjoiner to r/ɽ-prefixed conjoiner
-ɽá- r/ɽ-prefixed conjoiner to lwy-prefixed/prefixed conjoiner

Vlum Key:
0 noun
1 previous conjoiner
2 next conjoiner
4 first conjoiner
16 last conjoiner
5 previous prefixed conjoiner
13 next prefixed conjoiner
13 first noun


Adva:
prep 3
conj 1
verb 2
noun 0
unwritten KNP before root noun before any verb 0
other unwritten KNP 2.5
musa immediately following verb: 3.5
adva values are increased by the value of the consonant of the adva prefix used, liquids have no value if they are not part of their own syllables, but if they are, then they do
tc, ts, dj, dz can raised adva values by 1-4 without grammatic consequence, as can the use of a liquid without grammatic consequence if it is in a cluster with a non-liquid that is already having a grammatical impact
different types of conjoiners use adva to prioritize in different ways
any nouns at the very beginning(before first root) and very end (after last-root) may be applied differently within a sentence

Space-Time qualfiers are given a KNP that puts the sentence beneath it if given first, unless undone


In the case of Varkuzan prepositions, the preceding word is always related to the subsequent word. If the relativity is meant to be either inverted or coequal, a "u" or a "uï" is inserted immediately following the root "e" respectively forming a simple dipthong in the first case and a monothong-dipthong three vowel cluster in the second case e.g. êu and euĩ An exception to this rule is in the causal dimension itself where the given flow of causality is prime, but said alterications can still be used to alter this condition.

Varkuzan does not have the English equivalent of a "to be" verb, verbs in Varkuzan have to be active, prepositions are used for inactive situation. Varkuzan prepositions can be used to express the "where" "when" "what/who" "why" or "how" after a verb, these are all objectives of the verb but the prepositions are still often used to clarify the functions of the noun relative to the verb or to each other. If the first noun after the preposition is the direct objective then it requires no preposition, but in all other cases the preposition is needed. So, in Varkuzan, if you wanted to say "I went at nine to the market to get bread," it would look like the following with prepositions in yellow: ðǿm ðó yïc ʌŋstór ðreq ʌŋbred bleq; fix ém


VARKUZAN PREPOSITIONS

Each Varkuzan preposition has three aspects to it and the differences in these aspects is precisely how each Varkuzan preposition differs. These aspects are phase, dyam, and stut. The latter of which is just an acronym for Space, Time, and Thought, which are the three subvarieties therein. Lists of the following are:

Varkuzan Dyam:

ez
after as the positive opposite of before "over" "dimensional-difference" (prep.)
x after y
oĩez fez oĩer azucasefêum (müj 1.0)
er
before as the negative opposite of after "over" "dimensional-difference" (prep.)
y after x
oĩer fer oĩez azucasefêum (müj 1.0)
em
near as after or before (prep.)
x after y or y after x
oĩem kret oĩez ið oĩer (müj 2.0)
ek
between as after and before (see blue txt below) (prep.)
x after y and y after x; x after x (not y after y)
oĩek kɽet äð ez äj widóm äj ez äð äð ez äð äj tez äj (müj 2.0)
[2.0ð]oĩek fek oĩez oĩer (müj 2.0)
ex
encompassing as before and after (see blue txt below) (prep.)
x before y and y before x; x before x (not y before y)
oĩex kɽet äð er äj widóm äj er äð äð er äð äj ter äj (müj 2.0)
[2.0ð]oĩex fex oĩez oĩer (müj 2.0)
ed
"mutalear-1" as between or encompassing (prep.)
oĩev kret oĩek ið oĩex (müj 2.0)
ev
alternating as between and encompassing (prep.)
x after y and y after x and x after x and y after y
oĩev kret oĩek id oĩex (müj 2.0)
ep
"mutalear-2" as "mutalear-1" or alternating (prep.)
oĩep kret oĩed ið oĩev (müj 2.0)
e
with as near or "mutalear-2" (prep.)
oĩe kret oĩem ið oĩep (müj 2.0)
ef
without as not with (prep.)
oĩef ket toĩe (müj 2.0)
eq
"with or without" as with or without (prep.)
oĩeq kret oĩe ið oĩef (müj 2.0)
eb
"with and without" as with and without (prep.)
oĩeb kret oĩe id oĩef (müj 2.0)
ðwuvel*, el* elaboration
*dimensionally separate from dyam but functionally uses the same semantic space from which to operate

Varkuzan Phase:

ðwuel: -[blank] general, unspecified
ðwuel: ä separate
ðwuel: ø apart (separate but together)
ðwuel: e tangent general
ðwueɽ: eu tangent inclusive
ðwueɽ: oe tangent exclusive
ðwuel: é together (general)
ðwuel: ü overlap general
ðwueɽ: äü overlap lesser
ðwueɽ: ɔü overlap greater (echoing)
ðwuel: ó encompassing-coextensive
ðwud: -t/d/s/z coextensive

Varkuzan Stut Prepositions

General:
ðwux: (blank) general physical/abstract space
Space:
ðwux: ð- one dimensional generic
ðwux: h- vertical dimension
ðwux: x- horizontal dimension
ðwux: qk- depth dimension
ðwux: j- two dimensional generic
ðwux: zd- three dimensional
Time:
ðwux: d- time dimension
Thought:
ðwux: k/n/p- definition dimension (see below)
ðwux: s- similarity dimension
ðwux: m/f/ɣn- walnut (opposites) dimension (see below)
ðwux: tc- objective causality dimension
ðwux: cp- subjective causality dimension (see below)
*Additional Permutations are available through stut dimension variety suffixes
ðwux: spe- a cross between similarity and declared inversion: declared similarity i.e. metaphor setting two things equal based on unproven similarity; a symbol has definitive primacy flow, a metaphor less so, a simile even less

Intentionality Dimension?....what other "thought" dimensions are possible needed (indirect object=intentionality)


Varkuzan Stut Prepositions: Definition Dimension

ðwuð: k- adjective set Ex. car of blue: "car" kez "blue" or "blue" ker "car" *(hollow usage)
ðwuð: n- gestalt Ex. Baltic of Atlantic: "Baltic" nez "Atlantic" or "Atlantic" ner "Baltic" *(hollow Usage)
ðwuð: p- declared inversion (includes possessive) Ex. Get the radio. The kitchen radio or the bedroom radio? [the kitchen-radio, bedroom-radio relatonships fall under this category] the words are objectively not part of any set relationship based on definition or a direct part-whole relationship but rather their set-relationship exists circumstantially based on content and particulars *(hollow usage)
*KNP conjoiners are gramatically invisible to other conjoiners; other conjoiners only respond to the first root of the group but by extension are responding to the whole group; they are only used when specification is needed; an "-lg" suffix is used to indicate that an adjective-noun is modifying the root not the previous adjective-noun; if a noun precedes a conjoiner phrase without other modifications that whole conjoiner phrase serves as an adjective-noun relative to that noun

Varkuzan Stut Prepositions: Walnut (Opposites)Dimension

Facts: Varkuzan Walnut Prepositions are specialized prepositions that can relate more than two nouns together. They illustrate the "opposite" relationship(s).

PRIMARY VARIETIES

ðwuð m- indicates spectrographic thesis set (walnut stut preposition type)
ðwuð f- indicates molecular thesis set (walnut stut preposition type)
ðwuð ɣn- indicates ambiguous, dualistic, or unindicated spectrograhpic-molecular nature of thesis set (walnut stut preposition type)

RULES:
1. The first two nouns are unmarked; subsequent nouns are marked unless in the case of third noun as antithesis
2. The first two nouns being related are determined in the same way as other V. prepositions
3. Third and subsequent nouns being related, if they exist, are marked with suffixes that not only relate them back to the walnut-prep but otherwise break the normal noun-to-noun "of" rule between the marked noun and any now preceding only
4. If the first noun is marked by the walnutprep as being something other than the thesis or antithesis, then the second and the third nouns will be the thesis and antithesis respectively and the antithesis, the third noun, doesn't need to be marked as long as it is the word directly after the second noun, thesis
5. If the first noun is marked as the thesis, the second noun is automatically the thesis
6. If the first noun is the antithesis, the second noun is automatically the antithesis
7. The vowel root of the suffix syllable to be adding to mark nouns third position or greater is the dipthong "eu"

Walnutprep Marker List(Walnut Dyam):
These ending consonants apply in two cases: first as the end of the original walnutprep indicating how the first noun relates to the entire group of nouns, and second as the end of the suffix indicating which nouns have which positions of relationship to the group of nouns for nouns third position or higher

ðwuk: -ð prethesis to
ðwuk: -j thesissizer
ðwuk: -t thesis or antithesis to
ðwuk: -z thesis to
ðwuk: -m mesothesis to
ðwuk: -r antithesis to
ðwuk: -k synthesis plus to
ðwuk: -x synthesis minus to
ðwuk: -v synthesis to
ðwuk: -l vaguerizer to
ðwuk: -p not in walnut with

Examples:

tce id cpe
varkuzan phase for conjoiners in this case works in indicate the degree of indirectivity and is in turn anchored by a pronounic numerical suffix to avoid confusion of reference point in complex situations to the original direct cause e.g.
äð cpezäð äj cplezøð äz means äð was directly subj. caused by äj and äz enabled it so
ði: oêtcerték tcrêurték äð tcerték äj set äj if and only if äð
äð tcepø äjx and y indirectly objectively evenly cause each other direct cause omitted
äð tcevøð tceväð äj x and y objectively directly cause each other equally and therefore indirectly cause each other equally as well
tcezték x is true if and only if y is true
tcêurték x is whatever causes the following to be the case (sometimes involving x form of defintion esp. for conjunctions and other grammatical words)

Semantic Rules General Hierarchial:

a varkuzan conjoiner relates the first noun before itself to the first noun after itself
which words a varkuzan conjoiner relates can be innumerated by its adva prefix
an adva suffix attached to a varkuzan conjoiner innumerates the relativity of relation of the words related
if a musa follows a verb then the noun-verb phrase is a member of the set of said musa by means of declared inversion and the normal verb phrase rules apply as if the musa didn't exist
*verb objects
*to avoid confusion regarding verb objects and post-verb noun interrelationships, when at least two nouns follow, the direct object can either be incorporated as a suffix of the verb or the indirect object can be marked *if an indirect object is marked, then any no noun-noun adjective relationship exists between DO and IO *to avoid confusion in walnuts regarding post-walnut noun interrelationships, when at least two nouns follow, no noun-to-noun relationships exist between and walnut-marked nouns and each other or nouns preceding them *in the event of a walnut, the first two nouns following it are assumed to be part of the walnut without marking, so if that is not the case, a KNP conjoiner has to be used to illustrate that *verbs relate the whole of an arkon phrase if the default noun is thereto included unless otherwise specified
*when a verb relates a root noun in a noun-to-noun relationship, if the other noun(s) precede the root then they modify then entire noun-verb phrase if the follow the root they only modify the root noun as normal...if this is not desired, the adva values need to be changed, either that of the verb raised to trump the noun-to-noun entirely, or that of the subsequent nouns raised to overpower the verb (this is the case because unwritten KNP prepositions have different values based on their orientation to the root noun prior to any verb in a sentence, and this is in turn based on the assumability (by context) of what the root is, in cases of confusion, prepositions must be written, in which case, the adva is elevated of course to more than that of the verb meaning modifying nouns only modify the root noun because the KNPs are stronger than the verb
*if an a conjoiner relates an arkon that is part of a two-arkon conjoiner phrase then it must relate the entire phrase
*walnuts
*arkon phrases
*pronoun phrases(includes quotational)
*back punctuation
*adjective rules


Acknowledgements:
Circular causality indicated by second vowel or tdsz
Some causality objective some subjective: objective causality is usually hypothetical e.g. if the temperature of water falls below 32 it will freeze, and virtually all episodic causality is subjective
In subjective causality, an infinite amount of previous events cause each event, the goal is to isolate the most important based on two factors weighed against each other through the method of incrimental proportionality: time and departure from normalcy/predictability e.g. say a truck crosses the center lane and hits another truck causing an accident, the crossing over the center lane is a departure from normalcy or predictability which makes it the cause that is isolated over say the fact the other truck was in its lane likewise, the fact a road was built there at all might be equally special but has been the case for a long time hence is superceded by the cause that exists earlier in time
a varkuzan cause is always "a cause" not "the cause" if objective
In causal chains, designations (relationship of causes to each other e.g. direct-indirect) exists provided a discernable sequence of relationships can be established not unlike walnut structure e.g. if something is an indirect cause it implies a direct cause and its truthfulness is negated in the absense of one
Direct v Indirect: when the two most subjectively significant things are identified where the indirect causes the direct, through numerical suffixation, any number of layers can be indicated, each layer having multiple members potentially and lateral and even reverse causality possible in any topology, but the layer is determined by the relationship to the acknowledged "direct" cause, which even in a multiple/subject case is designated in order to make the association palatible
The departure from normalcy/predictability is in some sense measureable, but more by human perception than any technical method, holography probably holding the best hope in a way
*An indirect object has a similar structure, but is in varkuzan strictly the function of intentionality of the subject relative to the direct object and is in a sense the leader of its own column in its own right
A second-degree cause is not necessarily second degree it really means more than first degree it could just as easily be fourth, often one does not know other than they way it is meant relative to the degree one beneath specifically e.g. a third-degree is third specifically because of the relationship to a known second, which is second only because of the specific relationship to the first and the primacy thereto


Conjoiner to Noun Vowels changes:
ï....a
ï....class of direct object: ɔ,a
e...ĩu
i...a(nude);ø?